Brand Building Fundamentals: Brand Promise
Brand promise is the collective experience people have with your brand once you combine all other factors of your brand foundation. So it's not tactical or directive. It's the essence of the brand.
Brand promise is the collective experience people have with your brand once you combine all other factors of your brand foundation. So it's not tactical or directive. It's the essence of the brand.
You may be familiar with some of the standards:
Disney: Fun family entertainment
Coca-Cola: To inspire moments of optimism and uplift.
Nike: Authentic athletic performance
Makes sense for billion dollar brands. But what if you're not that?
A number of years ago I worked with the local Freestore Foodbank. An amazing organization that helps people get back on their feet through a range of services. When we talked with internal people, they gushed about their ability to help people transition into positive life situations.
But people outside the group thought they only gave away food.
We found that food was the catalyst to everything else.
If you haven't eaten in three days, chances are very good that you don't have much interest in talking about clothing, job skills, housing, etc.
Food comes first.
The brand promise became: Using food as a gateway to life transformations.
It captures the essence of the brand and gave internal audiences a focus.
Brand Building Fundamentals: Positioning
The best companies know they have to own a unique place in the hearts and minds of their consumers. In simple terms, this is positioning.
The best companies know they have to own a unique place in the hearts and minds of their consumers. In simple terms, this is positioning.
You can leverage a number of vectors including relevance, clarity, distinctiveness, and a whole lot more. But you cannot be all things to all people. Remember, this is about standing out in the hearts and minds of the people who have a chance of caring about your brand.
In his book, Predictably Irrational, Dan Ariely tells the story of Salvador Assael who, through a series of trades, ended up with a collection of black pearls in a day when everyone wore white pearls.
You might think the fact that they were different would do the trick. It didn't, any more than a black t-shirt is exponentially better than a white t-shirt.
Assael teamed up with Harry Winston who crafted the black pearls into luscious pieces of jewelry with premium pricing. Now, the product had exclusivity, a connection to a superior brand and a price tag to match all the glitz and glitter. Soon, black pearls were a necessary item in any reputable jewelry case.
Trying to sell black pearls didn't work. Positioning them as exclusive alternatives did.
Brand Building Fundamentals: Desired Consumer Experience
Branding only from the inside out opens the door to confirmation biases. It's just too easy to convince yourself that your brand is smart, innovative and darned good looking. But your brilliant product without an audience isn’t worth much in the market.
Brands often talk about what they bring to the market. The smart ones also think about how they want their audiences to respond. In brand building, this is the Desired Consumer Experience (DCE).
Branding only from the inside out opens the door to confirmation biases. It's just too easy to convince yourself that your brand is smart, innovative and darned good looking. But your brilliant product without an audience isn’t worth much in the market.
I like to consider three vectors for DCE:
What do you want your audience to THINK about the brand as a result of an interaction?
How do you want them to FEEL about the brand?
What do you want them to DO?
A few DCE examples:
(The brand) helps me feel like I can own my future
(The brand) is always working on my behalf
(The brand) helps me take care of what's important
(The brand) makes me feel like a rock star!
I tend to lean towards emotion in the DCE partly because emotional connections are longer lasting than simply having consumers think "I always get a good deal."
Ultimately it's your call. Just be purposeful in your choice.
Brand Building Fundamentals: Brand Personality
Brands can be fun, free willed, playful, studious, a work horse, etc. But those attributes don't drive much energy into the brand. Worse, your interpretation of "fun" may be decidedly different than mine. So we could work on the same brand using "fun" as the brand personality and end up in vastly different areas.
Every brand has a brand personality. Not every brand chooses to manage that personality. That's a mistake.
Brand personality has been defined as the human characteristics that embody the brand or brand experience. Helpful? Didn't think so. Let's rethink this.
Brands can be fun, free willed, playful, studious, a work horse, etc. But those attributes don't drive much energy into the brand. Worse, your interpretation of "fun" may be decidedly different than mine. So we could work on the same brand using "fun" as the brand personality and end up in vastly different areas. I think that's an issue.
I recommend people start with analogies (cars, famous people, bands, etc.) and then unpack what makes them work for the brand.
You might start with mountain climber Reinhold Messner. But everyone might not recognize that name. Unpacking that might get you to: Courageous, personable mountain guide: skilled, knowledgeable, engaging, with an intense desire to help others succeed.
It can be short or long. Just help people get on the same page and visualize the potential so internal and external audiences connect with the same powerful personality.
Branding Should Be Logical
Logical branding doesn't mean overly simple. It means people can easily understand the path from one end of the communication spectrum to the other, whether that's in the portfolio strategy, equity, architecture, Web site or customer service rep responses.
Over the last 15 years+ I've dug into and created branding programs for start ups to global conglomerates in almost every category and channel imaginable. What has become abundantly clear is that the strongest brands, and companies with zealous employees and brand fans, are crazy simple and logical.
Logical. Sounds almost too easy, right?
In the market I think it's a combination of vision and purpose—very few companies set out to confuse their audiences and make it difficult for them to find the products and services they want.
Logical branding doesn't mean overly simple. It means people can easily understand the path from one end of the communication spectrum to the other, whether that's in the portfolio strategy, equity, architecture, Web site or customer service rep responses.
Behind the scenes it involves the kind of brand building tools people inside those companies will use to bring the brand to life. It's been my experience that too many agencies promote complicated tools and "proprietary methodologies" that are hard to explain and harder still to use, and therefore end up in a drawer. The brand spends money on the agency but doesn't improve the experience or the brand.
I think logical is better.
Build Private Label Brands That Last
Consumers have been trained to perceive three tiers in most retail environments: cheap stuff, expensive stuff and everything else. However, owned brands can fall prey to presenting too many layers. Some retailers have difficulty killing off weak products or collections that no longer match the brand and instead create sub-tiers and super-tiers. When consumers can’t distinguish the nuances, they apply the three-tier rule for simplicity.
Private Label has come a long way since the 1970s!
In the US, private-label products have long carried a stigma of being the generics—the items people bought when they needed to compromise. Some point to the energy crisis of the 1970s as a boom-and-bust period for private-label products. Consumers were forced to trade down from their beloved brands to cheaper options because they simply couldn’t afford the items they really wanted. They bought a lot of private-label products, and—by most accounts—the experiences didn’t go all that well.
Two hard lessons were learned during this period:
1) Private label more often than not meant significantly lower quality and;
2) Consumers couldn’t wait to trade back up to brands and products they really wanted when their budgets allowed the switch.
Private-label advocates knew they had to find ways to build brand loyalty and gain credit for more than just being the lowest-cost option.
The good news is that private-label brands have made huge strides in the hearts and minds of American consumers. During the Great Recession of 2007–2009, as in the 1970s, large numbers of households were driven to private label. But one significant difference is that as the economy has shown signs of strengthening, consumers haven’t bailed from private label. A recent Nielsen report indicated that 71% of consumers say private-label quality has improved over time.
Can private-label brands hold on to their good fortune? We’ve identified five key principles that need to be in place for private label to hang on to and advance their share.
BUILD BRANDS INSTEAD OF COMPROMISES
Consumers always claim to want the lowest price, which is why so many private-label efforts follow a national-brand-equivalent (NBE) strategy. But when this happens, consumers are reminded that private label is the trade down from their desired choice. So private label gets no credit for brand or product innovation, nor loyalty based on its own equities. Consumers will trade up and out when possible.
Target’s Up & Up brand abandoned NBE lookalike branding, opting instead for clean, bright packaging and clear system architecture to communicate minimalism without sacrificing style. By building up its own brand, Up & Up created a recognizable, “cheap-chic” offering in line with Target’s master-brand positioning.
LIMIT YOUR LAYERS
Consumers have been trained to perceive three tiers in most retail environments: cheap stuff, expensive stuff and everything else. However, owned brands can fall prey to presenting too many layers. Some retailers have difficulty killing off weak products or collections that no longer match the brand and instead create sub-tiers and super-tiers. When consumers can’t distinguish the nuances, they apply the three-tier rule for simplicity.
Sainsbury’s evolution to private-label leadership began with a clear good/better/best strategy that provided separation within the tiers—“Basics,” “by Sainsbury’s” and “Taste the Difference.” Giving each brand a discrete (and complementary) job to do ensures products are organized in a smart, accessible way so consumers can quickly assess and know what they’re getting.
MATCH THE BRAND SCALE TO THE SITUATION
In today’s superstores, shopper mindsets shift from aisle to aisle. Know where private-label initiatives can succeed as large-scale systems crossing the entire store (such as Costco’s Kirkland Signature brand) or where they are more effective as smaller systems that leverage the unique emotional cues of specific categories (think Walgreens’ private-label-turned-national-brand Boots for high-end beauty). It’s important to match the needs of the brand, category and consumers.
MAKE EACH BRAND STAND FOR SOMETHING DISTINCT
People don’t buy what you make, they buy why you make it. Owned brands can become watered down over time by lack of clarity in the brand purpose or position in the marketplace. Building a purpose-driven brand empowers owned brands to use discretion when it comes to product assortment. And innovation against category white space can be a driving differentiator when tied to an established position.
Wegmans’ Simply from Nature pet line does this well. Driven by the insight that pets are family too, the line cuts out artificial colors, flavors and preservatives. Here, staking a claim to a considered brand experience—while still driving value—elevates product benefits to differentiators and positions for preference.
KNOW HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH
Consumers tend to shop retail categories in one of two ways as they move across the store: top-down quality assessments and bottom-up compromise. For top-down assessments, they’re concerned about failure, perception and replacement costs. Think about buying fresh meat, where the family meal is on the line. The typical household only buys a few types of fresh meat that they already know how to cook. This drives butchers crazy but it makes sense when you think about it. Because if mom screws up a London Broil she’s trying for the first time she ruins dinner and suddenly the family is doomed to cereal or pizza for the night. The family now has to pay twice for dinner ... and mom feels like she’s failed the family. That’s a lot of pressure riding on one cut of meat. Better just to stick with things she knows how to fix and look like a star at the dinner table. The same logic holds true for other categories as well, such as prestige cosmetics, where emotion and appearance count.
For bottom-up compromise, consumers look for products that deliver their desired level of performance, but at the lowest price possible. Think about buying commodity and high-use items like toilet paper, laundry care, dish care and paper goods. Sure, there are always consumers who want the best. National brands love and court that audience hourly. But not everyone wants to pay for a quicker picker upper. These consumers tend to start at the lower end of the selection set and find what works okay for their needs. For them, a paper towel that works okay is just fine. They’ll save money on paper towels and go buy more ground chuck.
While the faltering economy that drove the expansion of private label has improved, in its wake is a new class of value-minded consumers willing to keep purchasing private-label brands as long as they perceive continued quality and innovation. Brands that leverage these principles will be poised for both elevation and endurance.